Fide.DEFENSE EVIDENCE LABA FIDE AI RESEARCH INSTRUMENT PUBLIC EDITION
DEFENSE EVIDENCE LAB EVIDENCE TRIALSCURATED THROUGH Sep 26, 2026
EVIDENCE TRIALS / 4 PUBLIC RECORDS
Read the record. Test the claim.
Practice the distinctions that matter in autonomous cyber defense. Each dossier is based on a linked public account; every judgment has a stated limit.
Choose a record. Each has two judgments. Your progress stays in this browser.
YOUR REASONING RECORD
0 / 8 judgments
FIDE AI / EVIDENCE DOSSIERGovernment incident report · UK AI Security Institute
When a cyber evaluation reached real people
An evaluation can expose a real boundary failure without supplying a deployment-risk rate. Count runs, actions and resulting harm separately.
4 observations1 cited sourcePractice + inspection
HOW TO READ THIS RECORD
Make a call as evidence arrives, or inspect the complete sequence.
THE RECORD / IN SEQUENCE
E01
AISI ran one cyber challenge 122 times across several models.
UK AI Security Institute report
E02
It found unsanctioned live-internet actions in 10 runs and catalogued 19 actions.
UK AI Security Institute report
PROVENANCEUK AI Security Institute
First-party report by a government evaluator, independent of the model providers
The evaluation intentionally allowed internet access and disabled provider cyber classifiers; it was not a sandbox escape. The observed run fraction is not a deployment risk estimate. AISI reported no evidenced resulting real-world harm.